200M 400M 200M
RNG: 2.4 KM
BRG: 047°
ALT: 3,200 FT
SPD: 480 KTS
HDG: 012° N
TGT: ALPHA-7
MODE: SEARCH
PWR: NOMINAL
FREQ: X-BAND
STATUS: LOCK
NAVTGTWPNDEFRDRCOM
MIL-STD-1553IFF: ACTIVELINK-16: SYNC
SECTOR: ALPHA
THREAT: CLEAR
RADAR: ACTIVE
TRACK: 6 TGT
LAT 28.6213°N LON 77.3873°E
NX
Neometrix Target Acquired
GB Flag English
English Flag English
Indian Flag हिन्दी
Francis Flag Français
Dutch Flag Deutsch
Spanish Flag Español
Arabic Flag العربية
Russian Flag Русский
Japanese Flag 日本語
Portuges Flag Português
Italian Flag Italiano
Israel Flag עברית
Chinese Flag 中文
Korean Flag 한국어
Thailand Flag ไทย
Vietnamese Flag Tiếng Việt
Indonesia Flag Bahasa Indonesia
Malasia Flag Bahasa Melayu
Kiswahili Flag Kiswahili
Ethiopia Flag አማርኛ
isizulu Flag isiZulu
Hausa Flag Hausa
NMX‑AWS‑30 / Rev 00 / weight & balance · depots & lines / cells · platforms · CG fixtures 2026 · Product Page
NMX-AWS-30 · ENGINEERED TO ORDER — AIRCRAFT WEIGHING & CG MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS

Every kilogram has an address. Weight, arm, moment — proven.

Weight and centre of gravity govern performance, stability and structural life — and they drift with every repair, modification and repaint. So the aircraft is re-weighed, and the number is produced with discipline: calibrated load cells at the jacking points or platforms under each wheel; the attitude levelled against the datum by inclinometer; the hangar still, because wind over a tailplane fakes kilograms; fluids declared and accounted; zero checks and repeat lifts that must agree; and the CG resolved from moments by software that files the report into the tail's history. The same arithmetic, cradle-scale: component CG-measurement fixtures with safe handling — the quoted class. Equipment of this class has been quoted against a defence research establishment's requirement for a component CG-measurement mechanism and its handling systems; no delivered aircraft weighing system is claimed — the class is engineered to order.

Illustrative of the class — an aircraft weighing kit deployed in a clean hangar-style bay with no aircraft present: three bright machined load-cell columns with domed seats on low steel tripod bases arranged in a wide triangle, heavy black cables running to a small indicator console on a wheeled stand with its screen angled away, two rugged transit cases open nearby with foam cutouts holding spare cells and adapters, clean light floor with a yellow line, no people and no readable markings
Fig · 01 The jack-point kit — three calibrated columns, one console, and the cases that keep calibration travelling safely
Method
momentsreactions × arms from datum
Attitude
levelleddigital inclinometers, both axes
Conditions
still & accounteddoors closed · fluids declared
Proof
repeat lifts agreezero checks · traceable cells
Status
engineered to orderquoted CG-fixture class
ISO 9001 / 14001 Engineered to order Traceable calibration Measurement-GSE franchise Noida · India
01
Overview

The most important number you cannot see.

Nothing on the flight line looks less dramatic than a weighing — and nothing feeds more calculations. Every loading sheet, every performance figure and every stability margin stands on the last weighing report. The kit's job is to make that report unarguable.

Illustrative of the class — a wheel-platform weighing kit laid out in a clean hangar bay with no aircraft: three low-profile bright aluminium weighing platforms with gentle ramp edges placed in a spaced line on a clean light floor, black cables neatly routed to a compact display unit on a small stand with its face turned away, a folded canvas kit bag and small toolbox beside them, no people and no readable markings
Fig · 02 The platform kit — roll on, read, resolve: weighing without a lift where the schedule allows it

The method is moments. Calibrated load cells seat at the aircraft's defined jacking points — or low-profile platforms roll under each wheel — and read the reactions. Each reaction times its arm from the datum is a moment; the moments resolve into longitudinal and lateral CG; and the report joins the tail's weight-and-balance history, where every future loading calculation will stand on it.

The discipline makes the number. Level — attitude set against the datum with digital inclinometers, because an unlevel aircraft feeds cosine and moment errors into both axes. Still — doors closed, air handling calmed, because wind over a tailplane generates lift and lift reads as fake kilograms. Accounted — fluid states declared per the schedule and the equipment inventory recorded, because an undeclared hundred litres moves the answer by exactly what it weighs, at whatever arm it happens to sit.

And the same arithmetic scales down to a cradle. For individual articles — stores, pods, assemblies — a CG-measurement fixture stands on multiple calibrated cells and resolves the article's weight and CG in one setup, with handling systems that present it safely and repeatably. That component class is precisely what this page's quoted requirement describes.

Equipment of this class has been quoted against a defence research establishment's requirement for a component CG-measurement mechanism and its handling systems. No delivered aircraft weighing system is claimed: the class is engineered to order, and the record is stated as it stands.
Resolved

Moments, not guesses

Reactions at known arms, software carrying the arithmetic — because a slipped digit in a moment sum becomes a loading error that flies.

Conditioned

Level, still, accounted

Attitude proven, air calmed, fluids declared — the three lies removed before the first reading.

Repeatable

Believed when it repeats

Zero checks and repeat lifts that must agree, on cells whose calibration answers to standards.

02
Architecture

Configure, level, lift, resolve.

The schematic follows the weighing — the aircraft configured and levelled, the lift made in still air, the reactions read and repeated, the CG resolved and filed — and the kit underneath: cells and adapters, platforms, level references and software, and the component CG fixtures.

FIG · 03WEIGHING SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE · CELLS + ADAPTERS / PLATFORM KITS / LEVEL + SOFTWARE / CG FIXTURES + HANDLING
CONFIGURE + LEVEL → LIFT STILL → READ THE REACTIONS → COMPUTE + RECORD EVERY KILOGRAM HAS AN ADDRESS - WEIGHT AND CG GOVERN PERFORMANCE, STABILITY AND STRUCTURAL LIFE - AND THEY DRIFT WITH EVERY REPAIR, MODIFICATION AND REPAINT. SO THE AIRCRAFT IS RE-WEIGHED. MEASURES REACTIONS AT KNOWN ARMS - WEIGHT + CG FROM MOMENTS RULE LEVEL, STILL, ACCOUNTED CONFIGURE + LEVEL FLUIDS DECLARED; ATTITUDE SET BY INCLINOMETER LIFT STILL DOORS CLOSED - WIND FAKES KILOGRAMS READ THE REACTIONS CELLS AT JACK POINTS; REPEAT LIFTS AGREE COMPUTE + RECORD MOMENTS TO CG; THE REPORT JOINS THE HISTORY THE MASS-PROPERTIES INSTRUMENT MEASURES AN ARTICLE ON A MACHINE; THIS KIT WEIGHS THE WHOLE AIRCRAFT WHERE IT STANDS - SAME ARITHMETIC, DIFFERENT SCALE CELLS + ADAPTERS CALIBRATED, SEATED ON THE JACKS, ZERO-CHECKED PLATFORM KITS ROLL-ON UNDER EACH WHEEL, LOW AND LEVEL LEVEL + SOFTWARE INCLINOMETERS, MOMENT ARITHMETIC, HISTORY CG FIXTURES COMPONENT CRADLES + HANDLING - THE QUOTED CLASS OUR ROLE: KITS + ADAPTERS + PLATFORMS, COMPONENT CG MECHANISMS + HANDLING, SOFTWARE + REPORTS + HISTORY, CALIBRATION REGIMES, TRANSIT CASES, TRAINING, SPARES + AMC DETAIL · WHY THE DISCIPLINE, NOT THE CELLS, MAKES THE NUMBER UNLEVEL LIES COSINE + MOMENT ERRORS, BOTH AXES WIND LIES LIFT ON A TAILPLANE = FAKE KILOGRAMS FLUIDS LIE UNDECLARED FUEL MOVES THE ANSWER SO: LEVEL, STILL, ACCOUNTED - AND REPEAT LIFTS THAT AGREE A SLIPPED DIGIT IN A MOMENT SUM BECOMES A LOADING ERROR THAT FLIES - THE SOFTWARE CARRIES THE ARITHMETIC, THE REPORT JOINS THE HISTORY. LEVEL ATTITUDE SET, PROVEN LIFT STILL AIR, ZEROED CELLS RESOLVE MOMENTS TO CG, ON RECORD
Fig · 03 Level, still, accounted — and repeat lifts that agree
Arc · 01

Cells & Jack Adapters

Calibrated columns seated on the jacks at the defined points — zero-checked before every lift, traceable always.

Arc · 02

Platform Kits

Low-profile, ramped, roll-on — weighing without a lift where the schedule allows, with the same arithmetic behind it.

Arc · 03

Level & Software

Digital inclinometers against the datum; moment arithmetic, reports and per-tail history — the notepad retired.

Arc · 04

CG Fixtures & Handling

Component cradles on multiple cells with safe handling — the quoted class, article-scale.

Equipping a depot — or a component programme? Send the aircraft types, capacities and article envelopes — a clause-by-clause compliance matrix within two working days · [email protected]
Send tender spec
03
Specifications

Reference kits, built to the fleet.

The parameters below describe reference kits. Cell capacities, platform ratings, adapter geometries and fixture envelopes all follow from three givens: the aircraft types and their jacking points, the article envelope a component programme must serve, and the accuracy the operator's schedule demands.

Illustrative of the class — a component centre-of-gravity measurement fixture in a clean metrology room: a rigid fresh-grey steel cradle frame standing on four bright machined load-cell feet on a heavy flat base plate, a plain smooth metal cylinder resting horizontally in the cradle's vee supports as a test article, fine cables laced along the frame's extrusions, workshop benches soft-focus in the corridor beyond, no people and no readable markings
Fig · 04 The component end of the arithmetic — a cradle on calibrated cells, and an article's weight and CG in one setup

Where weighing goes wrong

An unlevel aircraft — cosine and moment errors in both axes, invisible until the loading sheet argues with the flight. Wind in the hangar — lift on a tailplane, kilograms that are not there. Fluids undeclared — a hundred litres somewhere moves the answer by what it weighs, at whatever arm it sits. Cells trusted on reputation — calibration out of date, zero never checked. One lift, one number — no repeatability, no defence. Side loads through the jacks — adapters that bind and read friction as weight. Arithmetic on a notepad — a slipped digit in a moment sum that becomes a loading error and flies. And a report that never joins the history — the next weighing arguing with a ghost.

So the discipline runs the other way. Attitude is proven, not assumed; the air is stilled; the configuration is declared line by line. Cells are zero-checked and traceably calibrated; adapters seat freely at the defined points; lifts repeat until they agree. The software carries the moments, prints the report, and files it in the tail's history — and at component scale, the cradle fixture does for an article what the kit does for the aircraft: weight and CG, resolved and recorded, in one honest setup.

Full specification — expand
SystemAircraft weighing & CG measurement systems — jack-point load-cell kits, wheel-platform kits, levelling references, software, component CG fixtures & handling
Governing IdeaEvery kilogram has an address — weight and CG drift with every repair, mod and repaint; the kit finds both, on record
The MethodMoments — reactions at the defined jacking points (or under each wheel) × arms from the datum; longitudinal & lateral CG resolved by software
LevelAttitude set against the datum with digital inclinometers — an unlevel aircraft feeds cosine & moment errors into both axes
StillDoors closed, air calmed — wind over a tailplane generates lift, and lift reads as fake kilograms
AccountedFluid states declared, inventory recorded — an undeclared hundred litres moves the answer by what it weighs, at its arm
ProofZero checks · repeat lifts that must agree · traceable calibration — the number believed only when it repeats
Jack-Point KitsCalibrated load-cell columns with jack adapters seating freely at the defined points — no side loads, no binding
Platform KitsLow-profile ramped platforms under each wheel — roll-on weighing where the schedule allows, same arithmetic
Component CGCradle fixtures on multiple calibrated cells + handling systems presenting the article safely — the quoted class
SoftwareMoment arithmetic, weighing reports, per-tail and per-article history — the notepad retired
The SplitThe site's mass-properties measuring instrument measures an article's full mass properties on a laboratory machine; this page weighs the whole aircraft where it stands — and its landing-gear legs are the very points it stands on
Scope BoundaryOurs: kits, jack adapters & platforms, component CG mechanisms & handling systems, software with reports & history, calibration regimes, transit cases, training, documentation, spares & AMC — including build to the operator's specification. Bought-in certified: load cells, indicators, inclinometers. The customer's: the aircraft, its datum and its loading manual
StatusEngineered to order — equipment of this class quoted against a defence research establishment's requirement for a component CG-measurement mechanism and its handling systems; no delivered aircraft weighing system is claimed
04
Variants

One arithmetic, four kits.

What changes is the scale of the article — a whole aircraft on its jacks, a fleet on its wheels, or a single store in a cradle.

Var · 01

Jack-Point Weighing Kits

Load-cell columns, jack adapters and console — the reference method, sized to the fleet's jacking loads.

Var · 02

Wheel-Platform Kits

Low-profile ramped platforms — roll-on weighing for line use, transit-cased and cabled for quick deployment.

Var · 03

Component CG Fixtures & Handling

Cradles on multiple cells with presentation handling — the quoted class, engineered to the article envelope.

Var · 04

Software, Calibration & AMC

Weight-and-balance software, calibration regimes, transit cases, training, spares and support.

05
Applications

Wherever the answer must balance.

The lines that weigh routinely, and the programmes that weigh precisely.

A · 01Air force & naval air depots
A · 02MRO organisations & overhaul lines
A · 03Aircraft & helicopter builders
A · 04Defence research & development programmes
A · 05Store & pod integration programmes
A · 06Flying training academies & operators
06
FAQ

Common questions.

Plain-language answers from the engineering team.

Q · 01 Why does an aircraft need re-weighing at all?
Because its weight and centre of gravity are living numbers, and everything important assumes they are known. Performance calculations, stability margins, structural life tracking and every single loading sheet all stand on the aircraft's empty weight and empty-weight CG — and both drift. A repair adds doublers and fasteners; a modification adds boxes, brackets and looms; a repaint alone can add a surprising number of kilograms spread over the whole airframe at every possible arm; years of small changes accumulate into a number nobody authorised. That is why weighing appears in maintenance programmes on a fixed periodicity and, additionally, after major repair or modification: the weighing report re-baselines the tail, and from that day forward every loading calculation quietly relies on it. The stakes are not academic. An error in empty weight misstates payload and performance; an error in CG misstates handling and trim, and a CG outside limits is a controllability problem rather than a paperwork one. Which is why the discipline around the number matters as much as the cells under the aircraft — a weighing is a measurement campaign in miniature: conditions controlled, instruments traceable, arithmetic carried by software, result filed into history where the next weighing can be compared honestly against it.
Q · 02 Jack-point cells or wheel platforms — which method, and why?
Both resolve the same moments; they differ in where the reactions are read and what the schedule demands. The jack-point method is the reference: load cells seat between the aircraft's defined jacking points and its jacks, the aircraft is lifted just clear, and the reactions are read at points whose arms from the datum are published and exact. It requires a lift — jacks, clearances, time — but rewards with geometry: the jacking points are machined references, not tyre contact patches. The platform method trades a little geometric purity for speed: low-profile platforms roll under each wheel, the aircraft is towed or rolled on, and the reactions are read at the wheels — no lift, faster turnarounds, ideal for line use where the schedule permits it. Its discipline is its own: platforms must sit level and co-planar (a platform proud of its neighbours re-distributes load), tyre and strut states matter, and wheel arms carry slightly more uncertainty than machined jack points. A well-equipped operation carries both — the jack-point kit for the baseline weighings the programme depends on, the platform kit for the quick verifications between them — and the same software resolves either into the same report format, so the history stays one history.
Q · 03 What are the classic error sources, and how does the kit remove them?
Three lies and a slip, all preventable. The attitude lie: CG is computed along the datum axes, so if the aircraft is not at its defined level attitude, every arm is projected wrongly — cosine errors in the reactions, moment errors in both axes. The kit's digital inclinometers set and prove the attitude against the aircraft's own levelling references before anyone reads a cell. The wind lie: an aircraft is a machine for turning moving air into force, and it does not know the weighing has started — a draught over a tailplane generates lift that subtracts real kilograms from a rear reaction and shifts the computed CG. Doors closed, ventilation calmed; a weighing is done in still air or it is done again. The fluid lie: fuel, oil, hydraulic fluid and water all have mass and all have arms; the weighing schedule defines their states, and the kit's report records the declared configuration line by line, because an undeclared hundred litres moves the answer by exactly what it weighs. And the slip: moment arithmetic done by hand invites a transposed digit that no one catches until the loading sheet misbehaves — so the software carries the sums, flags reactions that disagree between repeat lifts, and refuses silence: zero checks before, repeatability between, a report after. The cells themselves answer to traceable calibration on a schedule, because an uncalibrated cell is just a confident guess.
Q · 04 What is a component CG-measurement fixture — the quoted class?
The whole-aircraft arithmetic, shrunk to a cradle and made precise. Development and integration programmes constantly need the weight and centre of gravity of individual articles — stores, pods, nose assemblies, equipment fits — because the article's own mass properties feed simulation, carriage clearance, separation analysis and the parent aircraft's loading model. The fixture is a rigid cradle standing on multiple calibrated load cells over a stable base: the article is presented into defined supports, each cell reads its share of the weight, and the software resolves total mass and CG position from the known cell geometry — one setup, axes as configured, repeatable to the fixture's calibration. Around it sit the handling systems the quoted requirement paired with the mechanism: lifting, presenting and rotating an article safely between measurements, because a precision measurement that begins with an improvised sling is neither safe nor repeatable. The engineering lives in stiffness (a flexing cradle re-distributes load), cell geometry (arms known to the millimetre), kinematic supports that locate without fighting, and calibration transfer — proving the fixture against certified masses so its answers trace to standards. For full mass properties — inertia as well as mass and CG — the site's mass-properties measuring instrument is the laboratory-grade sibling; the CG fixture is its fast, article-shaped cousin.
Q · 05 How does this relate to the mass-properties instrument — and the landing-gear page?
Same physics, three different articles — and the family is deliberate. The mass-properties measuring instrument is the laboratory machine: an article mounted on a precision mainframe, static mode resolving mass and CG, dynamic mode resolving moments and products of inertia — ten parameters, friction fought with air bearings, accuracy carrying an audit trail. It measures an article on an instrument. This page works at the opposite scale: the whole aircraft, where it stands — reactions at jacking points or wheels, moments from published arms, CG resolved in the hangar rather than the metrology lab; and between the two sits the component CG fixture, the instrument's fast cousin for articles that need weight and CG without the full inertia suite. The landing-gear shock absorber page completes the picture from underneath: the weighing happens through the very legs that page develops — cells seated at the jacking points those struts define, an aircraft standing still on the components whose honesty this site writes about at length. And the inertia test facility extends the family to full-vehicle rotational properties. Weight, CG, inertia — article, aircraft, vehicle: one measurement franchise, each page holding its own scale.
Q · 06 What do you build, what is bought in — and what is claimed?
Divided honestly. What Neometrix provides: the kits — load-cell columns with their jack adapters, engineered to seat freely at defined jacking points without side loads; wheel-platform kits with ramped, co-planar platforms; the levelling references and their procedure; the weight-and-balance software carrying moment arithmetic, reports and per-tail history; the component CG-measurement fixtures and handling systems — cradles, kinematic supports, presentation handling — engineered to the article envelope; calibration regimes with certified-mass transfer; rugged transit cases; and installation, commissioning, documentation, training, spares and AMC — including build to the operator's own specification, which is how requirements of this class are framed. What is bought-in certified: the load cells themselves, indicators and digital inclinometers — precision instruments of established makers, integrated rather than imitated. What is the customer's: the aircraft, its datum, its loading manual and its weighing schedule. And the record, stated plainly: equipment of this class has been quoted against a defence research establishment's requirement for a component CG-measurement mechanism and its handling systems. No delivered aircraft weighing system is claimed; the class is engineered to order, kit by kit, around the fleet and the articles it must serve.
Related

The measurement family from Neometrix.

Weight, CG and inertia — article, aircraft and vehicle — engineered at our Noida facility.

Browse all Neometrix product lines.

Get a quotation

Send the aircraft types
and the article envelopes.

The projects desk replies within two working days with a clause-by-clause compliance matrix and a budgetary quotation. Write to [email protected] or use the form.

Enquire — weighing systems Capability sheet (PDF) +91 7777 876 876
ISO 9001 / 14001 ENGINEERED TO ORDER — AIRCRAFT WEIGHING & CG MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS EVERY KILOGRAM HAS AN ADDRESS · LEVEL, STILL, ACCOUNTED · MOMENTS, NOT GUESSES ENGINEERED IN NOIDA · INDIA
AIRCRAFT WEIGHING & CG SYSTEMS · CELLS + PLATFORMS + CG FIXTURES · SOFTWARE, CALIBRATION & AMC · ENGINEERED TO ORDER +91 7777 876 876 Enquire

Similar Products

Share This Page

Engineered To Standards Used In UK, NATO & U.S. Defence Procurement
DEF STAN (UK MoD)
NATO STANAG
RTCA/EUROCAE DO-160
MIL-SPEC / MIL-STD
Address
E-148, Sector-63, Noida, Delhi-NCR, India
Phone
Email
Working Hours
8:30 AM – 5:30 PM  ·  Mon – Sat
move to top arrow